- U.S. officials point finger at the elite of the Iranian military forces for the sabotage attack on oil tanks near the Persian Gulf.
- One week after taking the Iranian "preparing for possible attack" to US forces in the region, crew of neighboring Iraq.
- US and Iraqi officials insist that no one wants war, and President Trump denies plans to send 120,000 troops in the region.
- The US military justifies the assessment of a British high commander that "no threatened threat from Iran-backed forces in Iraq and Syria."
US officials said they believed they are the Iranian combat divers who are behind theat the end of the week, and they say CBS News's senior national correspondent David Martin without signing Iran
Martin said that American officials told him that there was "credible" and "immediate" intelligence that Iran had ordered Shiite militias in Iraq to prepare to make attacks against US troops and diplomats in the country. The State Department reserves all non-emergency staff and their families to leave Iraq, a country in the southern border of Iran where the Iranian government returns to various militia groups that have fought to US troops before.
"US citizens in Iraq are at high risk for violence and kidnapping. Many terrorist and rebel groups are active in Iraq and regular attacks on both security forces of Iraq and civilians. Military sects also threaten US citizens and Western companies throughout Iraq, "the Department of State said in its advisory.
State Secretary Mike Pompeo has changed the Trump administration's warning on Tuesday that the US was reacting against Iran if it attacked America's interests in the Middle East, but he refused to pin the blame for tanker sabotage in Tehran. US officials believe Iran has been involved in attacking oil tankers of the Persian Gulf
He said he had no "concrete connection" between Tehran and tank attacks , and adds: "I think in the coming hours and days find out the answer to that."
At a rally in the campaign Tuesday night, President Trump emphasized what became one of his qualities Foreign policy outside the country, which tells supporters that his administration is "holding dangerous regimes liable by denying them oil revenues to fund their corruption, oppression and fear."
But as Martin's reports, while the US has given Iranian economic peculiarity, the country remains perilous.
U.S. officials in Martin say that the Islamic Revolutionary Guards of Iran are responsible for Sunday attacks that blow holes in the hulls of Saudi and Norwegian ship tanks that are imported from Fujairah , which is outside the Persian Gulf. to have attached explosives on ship ships, but a defense official at CBS News said that the investigation was still needed.
Trump sends troops to Iran?
Mr. Meanwhile, Trump denies a New York Times report stating that the administration plans to send 120,000 American troops in the region to counter Iran. U.S. has sent a group of strike group aircraft and four B-52 bombers in the Persian Gulf.
President Trump's decline in the Times report came with a caveat: "Will I do that? Of course," he said as he left the White House on Tuesday. "We did not plan for that … and if we did, we wanted to send a hell of a lot more troops."
In Capitol Hill, Virginia Democratic Senator Tim Kaine blasted the thought of the president.
"It has become the height of idiocy.It is not unconstitutional. There is no way this president should get us in a war in Iran," Kaine said.
Iran escalates nuclear threat
Iran has vehemently denied involvement in attacking oil tankers and accused President Trump of playing a "dangerous game, causing devastating war."
But on Wednesday, Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said: "There will be no war, nor will they (the United States) benefit from waging war. They know it. we started a war and never started any war It is a confrontation of the power of will and the strength of our will is stronger than they are. "
He decides any negotiations with the current US administration, that they are "poison" for Iran.
But as he pushes the possibility of a conflict with the US, ayatollah has also dropped a massive threat Iran could take on measures within a few months – almost certainly draw a significant response to America.
Iran announced last week that in response to President Trump's withdrawal from the US nuclear deal agreed in 2015 with world powers, partially withdrawing from the terms of the agreement, too.
The Iranian regime said if the other parties to the agreement,can not know a way to work around US new sanctions to continue working in Tehran for 60 days, it will continue the development of uranium at levels prohibited under the treatment.
Iran is permitted under the terms of nuclear treatment to enrich uranium under just 4% concentration – a level where it is available for medical and scientific purposes, but is not easy to refine in a level required to make nuclear weapons.
The regime said no agreement reached Europe, Russia and China to maintain the 2015 gaming deal, it will continue enriching uranium by 20% – Officials said in the country that can be done within four days. This benchmark is important because once the uranium is refined to 20%, it is easier to maintain the 90% requirement for weapons.
On Wednesday, Ayatollah said "achieving 20% enrichment is the most difficult part, steps are easier than this step."
This is the first indication from the Iranian regime which may try to get highly-enriched uranium required for an atomic bomb – although Iran officials have always denied any interest in getting one.
Both were made by U.S. and Israel that they will not allow the Islamic Republic to gain the capability of nuclear weapons.
U.S. and allies on the same page?
There were signs of disappointment from European allies in the Trump administration's decision not only to bail on nuclear treatment, but to lift the new pressure on the Iranian regime.
Trump management and US military officials say that more than a week ago they have seen, "a number of preparations for possible attacks" on US forces at sea and in land in the Middle East.
The US has some 5,000 troops still in Iraq, at the Iranian border, and while the State Department's ruling on Wednesday for non-emergency personnel leaving the country does not specifically address the threat from in Iran, that's the implication.
Iran, a spokeswoman for the US Embassy in Iraq told CBS News on Wednesday that Pompeo ordered US non-emergency personnel outside the country because, "the threats that it is serious. "
However, on Tuesday, a British deputy commander of the United States military joint operation in Iraq contested the claims of a high threat to the forces of the allies in the region.
"There is no added threat from Iran-backed forces in Iraq and Syria," Maj. Gen Christopher Ghika in a video briefing from Baghdad to the Pentagon, according to The Guardian. "We know that presence, obviously, and we track them with a whole range of others because it's the environment we are in. We are investigating Shia militia groups that I think you are referring carefully, and if the level of threat is apparently raised then we will raise our security protection measures accordingly. "
But the US Military Central Command, which oversees the Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) in Iraq and all others American operations in the region, directly denied Ghika's "Recent comments from the deputy OIR deputy commander ran against the identified credible threats available to intelligence from the US and allies about in back-Iran forces in the region, "Central Command spokesman Capt. Bill Urban in the statement.
A US official told Martin that he was "flabbergasted" by the British commander's assessment.
Martin said that the Pentagon has released a very small intelligence detail pointing to the eight major threats from Iran, "and no details can easily be skeptical about how well intelligence is."
But Martin said he talked with many US military officials, including some privately who disagreed with the Trump administration policy in Iraq, and they all agreed with intelligence point to possible attacks by Iranian proxy groups that seem credible. [19659007SamantalainihayagngmilitarngGermanynahumintosapagsasanaysaoperasyonnitosaIraqnoongMiyerkulesngunitsinabinitonawalangimpormasyontungkolsapinataasnapagbabantasamgahukbongAlemansabansamulasaIran
said Jens Flosdorff protector of the Ministry of Defense confirmed that the military of Germany temporarily suspended the training of Iraqi forces, which "conducts itself in our partner countries," but added there was "no concrete warnings of attacks against German targets. "
The Netherlands made similar advertisements, holding mention of an undetermined security threat, but French defense officials said that their Iraq training missions were still unaffected.